Replit supports collaborative code review through its Multiplayer feature, Git pane, and Agent task board. Invite collaborators to your Repl, use the shared Kanban task board to assign and review Agent-generated changes, review diffs in the Git pane before committing, and use Multiplayer cursors to discuss code in real time. This workflow gives teams structured reviews without leaving the browser.
Set Up a Code Review Workflow Using Replit Multiplayer and Git
Code reviews catch bugs, improve code quality, and help teams learn from each other. This tutorial shows you how to build a lightweight code review process inside Replit using Multiplayer for real-time collaboration, the Agent task board for structured review stages, and the Git pane for reviewing diffs before merging. No external tools required — everything happens in the browser.
Prerequisites
- A Replit account on the Core or Pro plan (Multiplayer requires paid plans for full collaboration)
- A Replit App with existing code to review
- At least one collaborator to invite to your project
- Basic familiarity with the Replit workspace (file tree, Shell, Tools dock)
Step-by-step guide
Invite collaborators to your Repl
Invite collaborators to your Repl
Click the Invite button in the top-right corner of your Replit workspace. Enter the email address or Replit username of each team member you want to add as a collaborator. On the Core plan, you can invite up to 5 collaborators. On Pro, up to 15 collaborators plus 50 viewer seats. Each collaborator gets full access to the workspace, including the ability to start their own Agent threads and review tasks on the shared board.
Expected result: Invited team members receive a notification and can open the Repl. You see their cursors in the editor when they are active.
Use the Agent task board for structured reviews
Use the Agent task board for structured reviews
When collaborators work on features using Agent, each task appears on a shared Kanban board with four stages: Draft, Active, Ready, and Done. The developer moves their task to Ready when they want it reviewed. Another team member opens the task, reads the Agent-generated changes, and either approves (moves to Done and applies changes) or sends it back to Draft with feedback. This creates a natural review gate without any external tooling. Each task runs on an isolated copy of the project, preventing one person from accidentally overwriting another's work.
Expected result: Tasks flow through Draft > Active > Ready > Done. Changes are only merged into the main project after a team member reviews and approves the task.
Review diffs in the Git pane before committing
Review diffs in the Git pane before committing
Open the Git pane from the Tools dock on the left sidebar (or search for 'Git' in the search bar). The Git pane shows all changed files with visual diffs — green highlights for additions, red for deletions. Before committing, click each changed file to review the diff line by line. This is your checkpoint to catch unintended changes, verify that Agent did not remove existing code, and ensure the changes match the intended feature. Stage only the files you want to commit by checking the boxes next to each file name.
Expected result: You can see exactly what changed in each file before committing. Only reviewed and approved changes get staged and committed.
Set up a GitHub repository for pull request reviews
Set up a GitHub repository for pull request reviews
For teams that want formal pull request workflows, connect your Repl to GitHub. Open the Git pane, click 'Connect to GitHub,' and follow the OAuth flow to authorize Replit. Select an organization and create a new repository. Once connected, push your code to GitHub. Team members can then create branches in Replit's Shell, push them to GitHub, and open pull requests for formal review with inline comments and approval requirements.
1# In Replit Shell — create a feature branch and push it2git checkout -b feature/new-dashboard3# ... make changes ...4git add .5git commit -m "Add dashboard component"6git push origin feature/new-dashboardExpected result: Your Repl is connected to a GitHub repository. Feature branches pushed from Shell appear on GitHub where team members can open and review pull requests.
Conduct live review sessions with Multiplayer
Conduct live review sessions with Multiplayer
For real-time code reviews, have the reviewer open the same Repl while the developer walks through changes. Multiplayer shows each person's cursor position and active file in real time. The reviewer can click on any line to navigate to it, and both users can edit the same file simultaneously. Use the chat or video call (external) alongside Multiplayer to discuss changes. This is especially useful for complex features where a diff alone does not tell the full story.
Expected result: Both the developer and reviewer see each other's cursors in real time. The reviewer can navigate through files, ask questions, and suggest changes directly in the editor.
Create a team review checklist in your project
Create a team review checklist in your project
Add a REVIEW.md file to your project root that documents your team's review standards. Include items like checking for unused variables, verifying secrets are not hardcoded, confirming the app builds without errors, and testing key user flows. This file lives alongside your code and serves as a reference during every review session. Reviewers can open it in a split pane while reviewing diffs in the Git pane.
1# Code Review Checklist23## Before approving any task:4- [ ] No hardcoded API keys or secrets (use Tools > Secrets)5- [ ] No console.log statements left in production code6- [ ] New functions have descriptive names7- [ ] App runs without errors after changes (press Run)8- [ ] Changes match the task description on the board9- [ ] No files were accidentally deleted by AgentExpected result: A REVIEW.md file exists in the project root. Team members reference it during every code review to maintain consistent quality standards.
Complete working example
1# Code Review Process23## Workflow41. Developer creates a task using Agent chat52. Agent works on the task in an isolated copy63. Developer moves task to **Ready** on the task board74. Reviewer opens the task and reviews changes85. Reviewer either approves (moves to **Done**) or returns to **Draft** with notes96. Approved changes are applied to the main project1011## Review Checklist12- [ ] No hardcoded API keys or secrets13- [ ] No console.log or print statements in production paths14- [ ] New functions and variables have descriptive names15- [ ] App runs without errors after pressing Run16- [ ] Changes match the task description17- [ ] No files accidentally deleted by Agent18- [ ] Database queries are parameterized (no SQL injection)19- [ ] Error handling exists for API calls and user input2021## Git Workflow22- Review diffs in the Git pane before committing23- Use AI-generated commit messages for consistency24- For formal reviews, push feature branches to GitHub25- Open pull requests for changes that affect core functionality2627## Review Standards28- Every feature task requires at least one reviewer29- Bug fixes can be self-reviewed but must pass the checklist30- UI changes require a screenshot or live preview check31- Database schema changes require two reviewersCommon mistakes when reviewing code collaboratively in Replit
Why it's a problem: Committing Agent changes without reviewing diffs in the Git pane first
How to avoid: Always open the Git pane and click each changed file to review the diff before staging and committing. Agent can introduce unintended changes.
Why it's a problem: Having all collaborators edit the same file simultaneously in Multiplayer
How to avoid: Use the task board to assign isolated tasks. Each Agent task runs on a separate copy, preventing merge conflicts from simultaneous edits.
Why it's a problem: Not connecting to GitHub until the project is large and complex
How to avoid: Connect to GitHub early. This gives you version history, pull request capability, and a backup of your code outside Replit.
Why it's a problem: Skipping review for Agent-generated bug fixes because they seem small
How to avoid: Even small Agent fixes can remove important code. Review every change, regardless of size, using the Git pane diff view.
Best practices
- Always review Agent-generated changes in the Git pane diff view before committing — Agent can silently remove code as a 'fix'
- Use the task board stages (Draft, Active, Ready, Done) as natural review gates instead of informal Slack messages
- Keep review sessions focused: review one task or feature at a time rather than batching many changes
- Create a REVIEW.md checklist in the project root so review standards are documented and accessible to all collaborators
- Use Multiplayer for complex reviews where context matters, and Git diffs for straightforward changes
- Connect to GitHub early in the project so you have pull request history and rollback capability
- On Pro plan, leverage parallel Agent tasks so reviewers do not block developers from continuing other work
- Use AI-generated commit messages in the Git pane for consistent, descriptive commit history
Still stuck?
Copy one of these prompts to get a personalized, step-by-step explanation.
I'm building an app in Replit with a small team. How do I set up a code review process using Replit's Multiplayer and Git pane? I want structured review stages and a way to review diffs before committing.
Create a REVIEW.md file in the project root with a code review checklist. Include sections for workflow (using the Agent task board stages), a review checklist, Git workflow guidelines, and review standards. Keep it concise and practical.
Frequently asked questions
Core plan ($25/mo) supports up to 5 collaborators. Pro plan ($100/mo) supports 15 collaborators plus 50 viewer seats. The free Starter plan does not include Multiplayer collaboration.
Collaborators can see secret names and values in the Secrets tool. Cover page visitors see nothing. Remixers see names only. If you need to restrict access, consider using separate secrets for each environment.
Not directly. Replit's review workflow uses the Agent task board (Draft, Active, Ready, Done stages). For formal pull request reviews with inline comments and approvals, connect your Repl to GitHub and push feature branches.
Yes. Each Agent task runs on an isolated copy of the project. When a task is approved and applied, Agent handles merge conflicts automatically. This prevents collaborators from overwriting each other's work.
Move the task back to Draft on the task board. The developer can then modify the task description or prompt Agent to make changes. The isolated copy is preserved until the task is completed or discarded.
Replit does not enforce mandatory reviews before deployment. You can establish this as a team convention by using the task board and committing changes only after review. For enforced review gates, connect to GitHub and set up branch protection rules.
The free Starter plan has limited collaboration features. For full Multiplayer with real-time cursors and the shared task board, you need a Core or Pro plan.
For teams that need enforced review gates, CI/CD pipelines, and advanced Git workflows, connecting to GitHub adds pull request reviews and branch protection. The RapidDev team can also help set up professional review workflows that scale beyond browser-based tools.
Talk to an Expert
Our team has built 600+ apps. Get personalized help with your project.
Book a free consultation